29-Apr-2009 (Wed) Wherein we find press, videos, fonts, and crap that may or may not be crap.

Here's a nice article on the Eric Lewis show in the Guardian UK. Besides reviewing the show, the author also adds:

I'm not kidding, ABC actually used the phrases "lewd behavior" and "injurious to the public welfare and morals". In San Francisco. In 2009. Eat that, Lenny Bruce.

Yeah, I still boggle at that, too.

There are also some good video clips of the show on Youtube; I've added those to the photo gallery.

I've started collecting links to DNA Lounge in the press in a somewhat less haphazard manner than previously. Let me know if you come across any.

I also changed the front page of dnalounge.com a bit to hype the legal defense fund in a more "designy" way. Yeah, I put up an image with text in it because I wanted it to be in the proper font. What have I become.

I think this Facebook Connect commenting crap might be crap. I still can't make the colors be right, and I don't see any way to get it to notify me when people post new comments, which makes it pretty useless.

18 Responses:

  1. lnghnds says:

    I put up an image with text

    To hell with swine flu, now I know the end is near.

  2. Anonymous User says:

    Either I'm retarded, or the colors match for me.

  3. dasht says:

    There's this old concept people might remember from the 70s, sometimes seen parodied on old SNL episodes and the like: the "lounge lizard".

    The lounge lizard is a hack pianist that has an unusual skill to play by ear, knows a lot of jazz chord theory, and can play in simulacrums of a lot of styles. So, you go to the piano bar and tip and ask for some boogie-woogie and you get that. Or you go and ask for your favorite "unplugged" Allison Morissette tune or, if they're a fancy lounge lizard maybe you ask for "Take Five".... they deliver. Lot of breadth and *usually* not a lot of depth.

    Except that there's a subset of lounge lizards who are actually really quite good and they do all that lounge lizard stuff in their sleep to earn a buck but meanwhile they have real art projects going on the side.

    Ok, and then there's this trick you can do if you know a really good lounge lizard: get them to a private party with a piano and get them drunk and then butter them up. They fall for it every time: the result is always the same....

    You can get them to play some old standard but like that scene in Amadeus where Mozart satirizes lots of composers with "variations" - the lounge lizard will freely mix styles. So, they might play an old standard (like "Georgia on my mind") but they'll drift comically and drunkenly but with impressing skill amidst a bunch of styles - one verse boogie woogie, another T. Monk....

    The net effect of the drunken lounge lizard performance is this mesmerizing pastiche of styles, with lots of jokes in it - and no shortage of a sense of anger behind it. Anger at the de-humanizing, "de-artifying", reductionist commoditization of musicians (e.g., to get a job, answer questions like "can you play gershwin? can you play ragtime?" You get sick of that when really, on your nights off and at the low-or-no-pay gigs you're trying to to do something really profound - the pent up anger/resentment of how you suck up to drunken request makers comes out as these funny, poignent, drunken-lounge-lizard pastiches).

    Ok, well, that's the 1970s. And that little pattern that repeated itself across a lot of good lounge lizards was a kind of rediscovery of the kinds of expansive vocabularies of modern jazz which also comes from giving up religious beliefs about the formalist vocabularies....

    A guy Lewis' age grows up in an era where the "drunken lounge lizard" style is kind of an old joke. A lot of guys are able to do it perfectly well when not drunk. It's still "funny" and interesting but showing its age - like watching Abbot and Costello's "Who's on first" routine. There's something there, sure, but it's quaint and pointless.

    And guy of Lewis' talent grows up with a lot of exposure, training, and practice. Scales, arpegios, pedal techniques, classical, jazz (multiple styles), pop styles -- he's trained with a vocabulary ready made for louge-lizardry, not that there's really much of a market for that old trope of a style.

    And the guy Lewis grows up with a kind of Hendrix-esque, preternaturally sensuous approach to his instrument which, aside from the harpsichord or carillon or pipe organ is one of the most difficult instruments towards which to develop a sensual relationshiop. And he grows up with a keen interest and mind for jazz and applied theory and avant guard forms.

    So basically he's taken the old "drunken lounge lizard" gag and elevated to a personal, powerful, jazz and avant guard style.

    I think he's going to be pretty interesting to watch age as a performer. He appears to currently express a lot of something that at least refers to anger and he appears to currently be a little bit timid about stretching dynamic range towards quiet and structure towards more intricate - yet he also appears to have a lot of reserve strength in those areas in the performances I've seen so I expect that'll appear more as he gets older.

    Meanwhile, I think - and its just an interpolation, of course - I think the way he seems to "us" these days must be reminiscent of how weirdos like Monk came across back in their breakthrough days. It evokes a kind of "What the fuck was that?" feeling accomponied with the answer "I'm not sure, but I'm interested in more of it."


    • dasht says:

      I crave attention. Did that little "review" actually "work" for anyone or is it too personal and incomprehensible? Did it make sense and increase enjoyment for people watching the youtube videos of the DNA Lounge performances or... not? I ask because, like many, I'm trying to find things to do in the current economy so I look further in the direction of music critic or prune that possible line of exploration. Not that I think "music critic" is a growth industry or anything.

      Parasitically thankfully yrs,


      • nathanrsfba says:

        The first 5 or so paragraphs were interesting and taught me something about the 'lounge lizard'. After that it just sorta ... rambled.

      • elliterati says:

        Worked for me. It may have been personal, but was also perfectly comprehensible.

        • dasht says:

          I appreciate that. Thanks. What you didn't say (no, I'm not fishing) was "It made me want to go back and listen again and when I did I got more out of it." One function of good criticism of a good but challenging artist should be to have that effect - at least that's the case with critics I like to read. So, in that sense: too personal. Not too revealing - simply not "universal" enough. It's a kind of take on him I could pull off more convincingly in person with voice tone, and gesticulation, and a lot of "you knows?" and interaction - didn't work as well as I'd have liked as writing.

          I was inspired to try when I saw that the Guardian guy had written similarly to me in an earlier comment on this blog: that Lewis is hard to talk about but intense and words fail me. So I took a quick shot at it.

          More practice, tighter writing (this was a very quickly written piece) - and more feedback - and I *might* get somewhere. Shrug.


          • gryazi says:

            Bit late of me, but: the Hendrix analogy convinced me to listen when I otherwise would never have gotten around to it. I usually do anything I can to avoid "jazz," but I can appreciate that and you got me to notice it.

            The archaeological aspect re: lounge-lizards was also interesting to someone who's only ever seen the more recent caricatures.

            For a... different take on reviewing, you might want to check out Head Heritage's approach, between the Cope and Seth and whoever else writes for "Unsung." The stratospheric level of enthusiasm there can really... do something (but does require the subject material to be something you're enthusiastic about).

  4. Jamie Zawinski says:

    If it were "working" the backgrounds would be gaudy yellow and blue.

    If you are posting here logged in to facebook (you are not) then right next to your userpic where it says "Logged in as _Your Name_", the "Logged in as" text is black on black.

  5. Anonymous User says:

    Hey, Jamie --

    Does this newfangled thing mean I can anonpost on the dnalounge blog?

    Isn't that, like, anti-you? Have you thought this thing through?

    Your concern about colors leaves me puzzled, because they look OK to me, but as you say I'm obviously not logged into the abomination known as Facebook. I don't like the AJAX-ey textbox that I'm typing in right now - that it grows longer with every new line is disconcerting. And, for that matter, so is its white background...but it's OK.

    Merely OK. As in: If this is the worst thing I'm cursed with today, I think I'll get by just fine, but I'd prefer not. Especially if it this means that you both a) add functionality that you feel is important and b) have more free time for your brain, you know, not think about doom so much -- those things make it OK.

  6. Anonymous User says:

    Any reason why you put only six of the seven videos on the gallery?

  7. Anonymous User says:

    i did miss ABC on Spring break see topless guys and nude penis ,
    American Tax Bureau did make Million of Dollars ,

    ABC say lewd , they cant of been busy fucking the students ,

    Hmm , USA Banner where you been 3 Months , but got time for 1 day in DNAlounge , same rights for any .

  8. Anonymous User says:

    Dear ABC , if ya close club of digiboard says
    RNA , not DNA R as letter R in us - alphabet ,

    ya have my good .

    I neither want be in a club says RNA .

  9. Anonymous User says:

    ABC , why i tell this , i know ya felt uncerteain at DNAlounge , but wasnt some girl shake ass with little undies .

    Ya didnt cant even name it .

    I do .

    Club is name DNA , inside is all 4 secods a Digiboard says RNA .

    Fix the the owner to stop it , the real problem why ya ABC as like me dont feel well ,

    and ABC if cant fix the board need close a club and its emplyees ,
    i had expect USA harder .

    Fix this owner to stop digiboard say RNA and give him a penalty pay of 20 000 .

    So he knows he lives in San Francisco , all else is not going thrugh any adult judge that can drive a car .

    Give this fucken owner a penalty pay of 20 000 for RNA , he seems called DNA , google it is a big difference .

    And if he broadcast again RNA , close this club , whom this guy think it is pisses on the law of California even SF .
    ABC , get a clue , fuck him with RNA is hypmptisize ppl might make crimes ...
    Fuck him there 20 000 .
    All else , ABC is useless , i beat ya out with "spring break" , concerts .

  10. Anonymous User says:

    listen ABC , i have only seems 100 lines , and i dont go on all night post here .

    fuck the DNA owner does hypno audience with RNA board .

    20 000 dollar , if he ask why 200 000 .

    all else ya dont geht through .

    Any judge and jury that is almost know life is to go also go shopping , nots only gay man job ,

    will recognize ya have no basic fact .

    but this RNA , fuck this guy of DNA with 20 000 for the first , official text :

    Mr "Blah" tries via a announceboard to manipulate ppl isnot conform of title of disco , rather then the oppisite .

    We give hima warn penalty of 20 000 , on second fraud 200 000 dollar ,
    if cant pay within 30 days club is immediate closed , as like on a 3. fraud .

    ABC , work americaniish ,

    Im about to go on court against the USA i saw penis in "spring break" , listen ABC , do i look black , or gay or i dont get a girl ???

    For that my eyes seen that unwanted ,
    i want 1 Billion dollare reparation .


    ABC bastards ya made me see a penis , cough


Comments are closed because this post is 14 years old.